Posted by: Libby Rosenberg @ Access Group
The professional judgment panel was made up of Kyle Cronan, assistant director of graduate business financial aid, Washington University Olin School of Business; Glenda Palmer, Ph.D., assistant dean of student affairs and director of financial aid, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine; and Brad Russo, associate director of financial aid, Georgetown University Law Center.
The three presented some of their most challenging case studies to the attendees for review and discussion … and what a lively discussion it was. If one thing was clear it was that each of them could be presented with the same student situation and come to their own unique solution, and that each would be “right” and solve the problem.
When students are faced with what might be a dangerous or traumatic situation that will affect their ability to pay for their education, it’s up to the financial aid office to determine whether or not their situation warrants an increase in the cost of attendance (COA) which in turn would increase the amount of money they’re permitted to borrow. This is a big deal.
While it’s clear that there are vast differences case by case and office to office, one point was made very clear. “Use best practices as detailed in your policies and procedures, and document as much as possible. Remember, professional judgments are typically reviewed during program audits and reviews.”
The attendees’ conversations were very spirited and while some are “tougher” than others, it’s apparent that each of them cares for their students and wants them to succeed. I’m not a financial aid administrator. I don’t even work at a university, but it was so great to hear this very engaged group share stories, offer each other a different point of view, and offer support and advice.
Final thought: Document. Document. Document.